Quantcast
Channel: Product Communities
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 105279

Forum Post: Re: Actual d vs. Assumed d - RAM Concrete Beam

$
0
0

Thanks for the reply.

I'm getting a strange warning again in regards to d.  

Again it is an actual vs. assumed d.  When I look at the design results it shows a depth of 18.250" for the top long bars and the warning says the d from the assumed cover is 19.38".  I get this warning, hit optimize again in the V/U, and it goes away.  The beam is 21" with an assumed cover of 2.75" so the depth for the bar sets is correct, the depth for the warning is not.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 105279

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>